Opening Doors
            A HOUSING PUBLICATION FOR THE DISABILITY COMMUNITY

MAY 2002  
SPECIAL EDITION

Special Funding Alert

9,800 Section 8 Housing 
Choice Vouchers for People with Disabilities

Introduction

On March 26, 2002, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) released a Super Notice Of Funding Availability (Super NOFA), which includes most of the new permanent housing funding opportunities in HUD’s fiscal year 2002 budget.  This year, funds are available to support over 9,800 new Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers for people with disabilities. 

This special issue of Opening Doors focuses primarily on a very important Section 8 funding opportunity – the 3,950 Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities that Congress created for Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) designating elderly/disabled buildings as “elderly only.”  (For more information on the elderly only designation process, see issue 15 of Opening Doors available at www.tacinc.org ).  Unfortunately, despite the clear intent of Congress to assist people with disabilities, some PHAs eligible to receive these vouchers have neglected to apply for them. 

HUD highlighted this problem in a recent federal publication, Delivering on the Promise, which identifies key barriers to community integration for people with disabilities.  In this report, HUD states that “some PHAs are not requesting an adequate number of vouchers to meet the housing needs of non-elderly disabled families affected by designated housing plans.” 

TAC logo Housing Task Force logo

A publication of the
Technical Assistance
Collaborative
, Inc.
and the Consortium for
Citizens with Disabilities
(CCD) Housing
Task Force

door

What's Inside?

blueball.gif (924 bytes) Why Aren't PHAs Applying?

blueball.gif (924 bytes) Track Record of PHAs

blueball.gif (924 bytes) Next Steps - Capitalizing on the New Vouchers Available

blueball.gif (924 bytes) PHAs with Elderly Only Allocation Plans

blueball.gif (924 bytes) HUD's Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs

Featured in this Funding Alert are:

§         Strategies for the disability community to urge PHAs to apply all available Section 8 vouchers, including two other set-asides of Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities;

§         An outline of how non-profit disability organizations can apply directly to administer vouchers through one of these set-asides; and

§         A brief overview of other available HUD funding opportunities.  

More information on how to apply for all of these resources can also be found at www.tacinc.org.

Elderly Only Designation Linked to Section 8 Vouchers 

Since 1995, the nation’s PHAs have been able to designate federal public housing buildings as elderly only.  Once this designation occurs, people with disabilities under age 62 are no longer permitted to move into the properties that have been designated (even if they have been on the waiting list for years) unless there are no elderly households on the waiting list.  

Because elderly only designation has obvious negative consequences for people with disabilities, each year since 1997, Congress has provided new Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities who are adversely affected when units in public housing buildings are designated elderly only.  These vouchers have been made available each year to PHAs through the Rental Assistance for Non-Elderly Persons with Disabilities in Support of Designated Housing Plans program (referred to as the “Designated Housing” program). 

The Plight of John

There is no question that people with disabilities have few housing options left for them when studio and one-bedroom public housing apartments are exclusively reserved for elderly households.  Consider the plight of John, a man with multiple sclerosis who is 45 years old.  Until four years ago, John earned $25,000 a year as a copy editor.  Unfortunately, his disability progressed so that he can no longer work, and he now relies on $700 per month in Social Security Disability Income benefits. 

John applied for elderly/disabled public housing in 1999 and is still on the waiting list.  In 2001, John’s PHA received approval from HUD to designate the units in this public housing development as elderly only.  HUD’s approval means that as long as there is an elderly person on this PHA’s public housing waiting list – even if they applied yesterday – the elderly person will be offered the next vacant unit that becomes available.  The only way that John will be able to move into this property is if there are literally no elderly households left on the waiting list.  Because the housing John applied for is very desirable, well located, and well maintained, elderly households apply to live there on a regular basis.  John stands virtually no chance of getting a unit in this property until he turns 62. 

As part of the designation process, the PHA could have requested new Section 8 vouchers from HUD to help people with disabilities like John who were on PHA’s public waiting list or who might have applied at some future time if the housing had not been designated.  Unfortunately, this PHA decided not to request these vouchers.  HUD also did not obligate the PHA to apply for new Section 8 vouchers for people like John as a condition of approving the PHA’s Allocation Plan (the plan required by HUD in order to designated any public housing units).  In its Allocation Plan, the PHA told HUD that they would make other resources available for people like John.  However, John is still struggling to find an affordable apartment and doesn’t have a Section 8 voucher to help him pay the rent. 

Why Aren’t PHAs Applying?

Unfortunately, there are many people like John who have been deprived of federally subsidized housing opportunities because of elderly only housing policies.  Housing advocates for people with disabilities are still trying to decipher why PHAs that have designated public housing units as elderly only do not apply for these new vouchers and what can be done about it. 

Public Law 104-120, which governs elderly only designation, states that PHAs seeking to designate elderly only housing must give HUD a description of “any plans to secure additional resources or housing assistance to provide assistance to families that may have been housed if occupancy in the project were not restricted” [emphasis added].  HUD guidance issued on March 12, 1997 further states that this law focuses on the total housing needs of the low-income population of a community and not one group – such as elderly households – in particular.  The HUD Notice further states: 

In most communities, there are substantial unmet housing needs of both elderly families and persons with disabilities.  For these communities, a public housing authority’s demonstration that it will make reasonable efforts to provide tenant based assistance or other appropriate resources to the non-designated group is sufficient for designation.  [Emphasis added] 

The most obvious interpretation of the above federal policy is that: 

Þ    If there is an unmet need for housing for people with disabilities in a community; 

Þ    And if a PHA intends to designate elderly/disabled public housing as elderly only;  

Þ    And if Congress has made available new Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities specifically for these PHAs designating elderly only housing; 

Þ    Then it is reasonable to expect that PHAs would be obligated to apply for them. 

Through this Opening Doors Funding Alert, the Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. (TAC) and the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Housing Task Force (CCD Housing Task Force) are urging housing advocates for people with disabilities to contact PHAs that have been designating elderly only housing and remind them of their obligation to apply for these vouchers during this year’s Section 8 application process.  To be as effective as possible in these discussions, advocates will need information about: 

Ø      Available Section 8 vouchers and how PHAs can apply for them; and

Ø      Which PHAs have designated elderly only housing and whether they have or have not applied for Section 8 vouchers in conjunction with this designation. 

New Section 8 Vouchers to Replace Elderly Only Public Housing 

This year, Congress has appropriate $20 million in new funding to provide 3,950 new Designated Housing Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities who can no longer move into elderly only public housing units.  A PHA is eligible to apply for up to 200 of these vouchers.  Applications for these vouchers are due to HUD by July 23, 2002

Despite the number of public housing units that have disappeared for people with disabilities over the years, PHAs have been slow to apply for vouchers to replace these lost units.  In fact, for the past several years, HUD has not received enough applications from PHAs designating elderly only housing to give out all the available vouchers.  For example, during a recent 12-month period, HUD approved 50 PHA Allocation Plans but only 5 of these PHAs applied for the new vouchers that Congress linked to public housing designation. 

From these data, it is reasonable to conclude that many people with disabilities who were on PHA public housing waiting lists – like John mentioned above – have been left with no affordable housing options at all.  Advocates for people with disabilities have been concerned by this lack of response from PHAs, and are intent on making sure that PHAs do not shirk their responsibilities to people with disabilities in their eagerness to create elderly only buildings. 

PHAs with HUD-Approved Allocation Plans Eligible to Apply for New Vouchers 

In order to be eligible to apply for the new “Designated Housing” vouchers, PHAs must have a HUD-approved Allocation Plan.  As stated above, HUD has been approving Allocation Plans since 1995, and has approved a total of 196 plans to date.  These plans, in the aggregate, have designated approximately 63,000 units of public housing as elderly only.  Many of these are units with accessibility modifications to accommodate the needs of people with disabilities.  More and more units are being designated each month and HUD is now granting extensions to plans that were originally approved in the mid-1990s. 

PHAs with a HUD-approved Allocation Plan are eligible to apply for this set-aside of Section 8 vouchers, even if the Allocation Plan was approved three or four years ago.  In order to assist the disability community to identify these PHAs, TAC has included a list of all PHAs with Allocation Plans approved since 1997 in Table 1.  This table, which is compiled from data made available by HUD, is organized alphabetically by state.  To view HUD’s most up-to-date listing, go to www.hud.gov/offices/pih/centers/sac/designated

Track Record of PHAs 

A review of HUD’s data from Table 1 shows that some PHAs have neglected to apply for these new Section 8 vouchers targeted to people with disabilities affected by designation, even though PHAs have reduced the number of public housing units available to people with disabilities.  The table on page 6 indicates exactly how many public housing units were designated elderly only and how many vouchers the PHA received from HUD that year.  It is important to note that PHAs that have designated elderly only housing can apply year after year for new vouchers for people with disabilities as long as: (1) Congress makes new vouchers available; and (2) the PHA can show a need for the vouchers.  To illustrate how Table 1 should be interpreted, some examples of the data included in this table are provided below: 

Ø      The Municipal Housing Authority in Des Moines, Iowa designated 190 units of public housing as elderly only in 2001 but did not receive any designated vouchers from HUD. 

Ø      The Housing Authority of Durham, North Carolina also designated elderly only housing in 2001 – 389 units in total – and requested 200 vouchers for people with disabilities to offset this loss of housing. 

Ø      In 1999, the Housing Authority of West Warwick, Rhode Island designated 250 units of public housing as elderly only but did not receive any vouchers for people with disabilities in 1999, 2000, or 2001, even though vouchers were available. 

Ø      The City of Las Vegas Housing Authority also designated 570 units as elderly only housing in 1999.  However, this PHA has received 200 new vouchers for people with disabilities each year since 1999. 

Are People with Disabilities Being Adversely Affected by Designation? 

It is difficult to know for certain what happens to people with disabilities on public housing waiting lists once designation occurs.  For example, it is reasonable to conclude that people with disabilities in Las Vegas, Nevada who were adversely affected by designation were given other housing options because the PHA applied for a total of 600 new Section 8 vouchers over a three-year period.  However, it is very difficult to learn what happened to people with disabilities in communities that never received new vouchers to mitigate the impact of designation. 

To learn more, the disability community may want to ask these questions to PHAs that did not receive new vouchers linked to designation: 

If the answer to the last question is yes, then these follow-up questions are also important: 

Next Steps – Capitalizing on the New Vouchers Available 

It is clear that the disability community must take the lead in holding PHAs accountable for designation, and must do more to ensure that PHAs apply for every voucher that Congress makes available for elderly only designation purposes.  Showing a legitimate demand for these vouchers is the best way to show federal policy makers that these set-aside vouchers are needed – and will continue to be needed – as long as PHAs continue to designate housing as elderly only. 

To obtain new vouchers, the disability community must immediately organize to do several things: 

  1. Determine if the local PHA intends to designate public housing as elderly only this year.  HUD’s NOFA sets a deadline of May 20 for PHAs to file Allocation Plans and be eligible to apply for new vouchers available this year.  If the PHA plans to designate public housing units but does not request vouchers this year, people with disabilities adversely affected by this designation might never receive a voucher.
  1. Review Table 1 to identify PHAs with Allocation Plans approved since 1997.  Did the PHA receive vouchers as a result of the designation?  If so, were they sufficient to address the lost housing opportunities for people with disabilities as the result of designation?  You can begin to assess this loss by asking the PHA’s Board of Commissioners or Executive Director some of the key questions already identified.  It would be most effective to ask the PHA these questions at a public meeting as well as in writing, and request a written response.
  1. Determine if your PHA currently has a Section 8 utilization rate of at least 97 percent.  PHAs that have a Section 8 utilization rate of less than 97 percent are not eligible to apply for any new Section 8 vouchers this year.  The Section 8 utilization rate is used by HUD to ensure that the majority of vouchers the PHA currently administers are leased – theoretically indicating that the PHA needs new vouchers to meet demand.  HUD has a list of PHAs with utilization rates over 97 percent as of February 26, 2002 online at www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/nofa/other/fairshare-pha.doc.

Unfortunately, the 97 percent utilization rate requirement is a real barrier for disability advocates seeking to convince a PHA to apply for new vouchers.  It is also a problem for people with disabilities who need subsidized housing because there is no guarantee or obligation that a PHA designating elderly only housing will set-aside any of its existing unused vouchers for people with disabilities. 

  1. Collect separate data to demonstrate the housing needs of people with disabilities and relate it to the loss of housing from designation.  This data can come from a variety of sources, but should make a clear case for the need for more housing resources for people with disabilities.
  1. Bring a copy of the NOFA (available online at www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/nofa/radhsec.pdf) or a copy of this issue of Opening Doors to a meeting with the PHA.  Show the PHA that they will be held publicly accountable for submitting a Section 8 application on behalf of people with disabilities.

Remember that a PHA with housing designated elderly only as far back as 1995 is eligible to apply to obtain new vouchers from this set-aside, even if they have applied in the past.  For HUD’s complete and most up-to-date listing of all Allocation Plans, go to www.hud.gov/offices/pih/centers/sac/designated.  In fact, last year, 8 of the 13 applications received by HUD for these vouchers were from PHAs that had designated housing in prior years. 

  1. Determine if the PHA’s Allocation Plan has expired, is about to expire, or has been extended.  If the Allocation Plan has expired (the HUD approval to designate is good for only five years), then the PHA must either: 1) apply to have the plan extended for an additional two years; or 2) begin to permit occupancy again by people with disabilities under age 62.  If the PHA is planning to extend its Allocation Plan, it is a good time to insist that they also apply for new Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities.
  1. If a PHA has an approved PHA Allocation Plan and at least a 97 percent Section 8 utilization rate, insist they apply for new Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities if there is any indication that people with disabilities have lost housing opportunities as a result of the designation!  Remember, this is the reason Congress put these funds in HUD’s budget in the first place: to ensure that the housing rights of people with disabilities would be respected and protected.

Table 1: PHAs with Elderly Only Allocation Plans 

Below is a list of PHAs with HUD-approved elderly only Allocation Plans from 1997 through March 8, 2002.*  This chart is adapted from HUD’s online version, posted at www.hud.gov/offices/pih/centers/sac/designated.   Please refer to this site for information on Allocation Plans approved before 1997.  The PHAs are organized by state including the number of units designated elderly only as well as the number of Section 8 vouchers awarded to the PHA in conjunction with the Allocation Plan (if any).

State

Housing Agency (PHA)

# Units Designated

# Vouchers Awarded (Year)

PHAs with Plans Currently Pending Approval

KS

Topeka PHA

unknown

N/A

LA

PHA of New Orleans

unknown

N/A

NE

Omaha PHA

unknown

N/A

OH

Dayton Metropolitan PHA

unknown

N/A

OH

Zanesville Metropolitan PHA

unknown

N/A

TN

Tennessee Housing Development Agency

unknown

N/A

PHAs with Approved Allocation Plans**

AL

Mobile Housing Board

122

122 (‘00)

AZ

City of Phoenix

264

200 (‘98)

CA

City of Santa Barbara PHA

142

100 (‘97)

CA

Imperial Valley PHA

34

49 (‘97)

CA

Kern County PHA

150

150 (‘98)

CA

Oakland PHA

383

85 (‘01)

CO

Boulder City PHA

95

none

CT

Danbury PHA

152

152 (‘99)

CT

Greenwich PHA

150

78 (‘00)

CT

PHA of City of New Haven

95

none

CT

Manchester PHA

100

36 (‘00)

CT

Naugatuck PHA

104

20 (‘00)

CT

Norwalk PHA

249

50 (‘98)

CT

Stratford PHA

171

none

CT

Torrington PHA

198

none

CT

Vernon PHA

136

none

CT

Winchester PHA

79

20 (‘01)

CT

Windsor Locks PHA

60

32 (‘00)

DC

DC PHA***

392

47 (‘99);

200 (‘00)

FL

PHA of Brevard County

159

200 (‘00)

FL

PHA of Hollywood

90

none

FL

PHA of the City of Daytona Beach

142

30 (‘98)

FL

PHA of the City of Key West

199

none

FL

PHA of the City of Lakeland

33

none

FL

PHA of the City of Miami Beach

200

none

FL

Hialeah PHA

640

148 (‘01)

FL

Jacksonville PHA

617

75 (‘98)

FL

Melbourne PHA

100

none

FL

Miami-Dade PHA

381

200 (‘99)

FL

Orlando PHA

48

none

FL

Palm Beach County PHA

100

none

FL

Tampa PHA

600

150 (‘99)

GA

PHA of Fulton County

223

none

IA

Des Moines Municipal PHA

190

none

IA

Keokuk PHA

50

none

IA

Waterloo PHA

50

none

IL

PHA of Elgin

150

none

IL

PHA of the City of Waukegan

98

none

IL

Morgan County PHA

173

none

IL

Peoria PHA

297

none

IN

PHA of the City of New Albany

365

200 (‘00)

KS

Lawrence PHA***

294

30 (‘99)

KS

Newton PHA

100

none

KS

Wichita PHA

176

176 (‘99)

KY

PHA of Louisville

59

none

KY

Lexington-Fayette Urban County PHA

185

25 (‘97)

KY

Owensboro PHA

76

none

LA

PHA of New Orleans

168

none

LA

PHA of the City of Jennings

40

none

MA

Brockton PHA

758

100 (‘98)

MA

Cambridge PHA

817

200 (‘97)

MA

Lowell PHA

596

none

MA

New Bedford PHA

58

none

MD

PHA of Baltimore City***

157

200 (‘98)

MI

Battle Creek Housing Commission

150

100 (‘98)

MI

Bay City PHA

115

50 (‘01)

MI

Dearborn Housing Commission

313

50 (‘00)

MI

Detroit Housing Commission

1584

none

MI

Eastpointe Housing Commission

164

none

MI

Hamtramck Housing Commission

150

none

MI

Inkster Housing Commission

120

none

MI

Lincoln Park Housing Commission

103

none

MI

Livonia Housing Commission

158

25 (‘01)

MI

Pontiac Housing Commission

175

none

MI

Roseville Housing Commission

214

none

MI

Saginaw Housing Commission

306

none

MN

City of Minneapolis PHA

2718

none

MN

HRA of the City of South St Paul

296

none

MN

Moorhead Public Housing Agency

47

none

MO

Excelsior Springs PHA

79

none

MO

Kansas City PHA***

179

none

MO

St. Louis PHA

40

none

MT

Butte County Housing and Redevelopment Commission

66

10 (’01)

NC

PHA of Asheboro

50

none

NC

PHA of Asheville

4

none

NC

PHA of Charlotte

727

200 (‘99)

NC

PHA of Durham

389

200 (‘01)

NC

PHA of Greensboro

427

100 (‘97)

NC

PHA of High Point

224

50 (‘97)

NC

PHA of Winston-Salem

306

73 (‘97)

NE

Omaha PHA

268

100 (‘97)

NH

Dover PHA

184

30 (‘97)

NH

Somersworth PHA

49

none

NJ

Clementon PHA

70

20 (‘01)

NJ

Englewood PHA

152

none

NJ

PHA of Gloucester County

180

none

NJ

Lakewood Township

144

none

NV

City of Las Vegas PHA

570

200 (‘99); 200 (‘00); 200 (‘01)

NV

North Las Vegas PHA

120

71 (‘00)

NY

Amsterdam PHA

195

none

NY

City of Buffalo

990

200 (’99)

NY

Geneva PHA

98

none

NY

Gloversville PHA

217

none

NY

New York City PHA

9849

200 (‘99); 200 (‘00); 200 (‘01)

NY

Plattsburgh PHA

100

none

OH

Allen Metropolitan PHA

40

none

OH

Ashtabula Metropolitan PHA

221

60 (‘97)

OH

Clermont Metropolitan PHA

58

none

OH

Columbus Metropolitan PHA

30

none

OH

Cuyahoga Metropolitan PHA

2499

none

OH

Dayton Metropolitan PHA

433

none

OH

Hamilton County

352

none

OH

Licking Metro PHA

98

30 (‘00)

OH

Lucas Metropolitan PHA

407

150 (‘97)

OH

Trumbull Metropolitan PHA

150

none

OK

Oklahoma City PHA

201

200 (‘00)

OK

Shawnee PHA

122

none

OK

Tulsa PHA

79

none

OR

Coos-Curry PHA

50

none

OR

PHA of the City of Salem

62

44 (‘97)

PA

Allegheny County PHA***

881

none

PA

Blair County PHA

26

none

PA

Bucks County PHA

561

150 (’99)

PA

Butler County PHA

158

50 (’97); 75 (‘99)

PA

Chester PHA

195

none

PA

Cumberland County PHA

59

none

PA

Easton PHA

100

none

PA

Franklin County PHA

55

none

PA

PHA City of Pittsburgh**

77

none

PA

Harrisburg PHA

510

150 (‘00)

PA

Indiana County PHA

10

none

PA

Johnstown PHA

354

none

PA

Lackawanna County PHA

312

100 (‘98)

PA

Lehigh County PHA

190

190 (‘00)

PA

McKeesport PHA

200

none

PA

Nanticoke PHA

291

none

PA

Philadelphia PHA***

425

200 (‘98); 150 (‘99)

PR

Puerto Rico Department of Housing

40

none

RI

Newport PHA

110

none

RI

North Providence PHA

127

25 (‘97)

RI

Pawtucket PHA

346

75 (‘97)

RI

Portsmouth PHA

40

none

RI

South Kingston PHA

16

none

RI

Tiverton PHA

45

none

RI

Town of Bristol PHA

220

none

RI

West Warwick PHA

250

none

TN

Chattanooga PHA

610

100 (‘00)

TN

Cookeville PHA

158

none

TN

Memphis PHA

80

none

TX

PHA of the City of Houston

155

50 (‘98)

VA

Hampton Redevelopment and PHA

126

none

VA

Norfolk Redevelopment and PHA

100

none

VA

Petersburg Redevelopment and PHA

100

none

VT

Brattleboro PHA

166

75 (‘98)

WA

Seattle PHA

131

200 (‘01)

WI

Middleton PHA

126

none

WI

Milwaukee County PHA

1241

none

WV

PHA of the City of Charleston

214

none

WV

PHA of the City of Huntington

350

56 (‘00)

WV

PHA of the City of Martinsburg

105

none

*Because of incomplete HUD data, the Boston (MA) PHA and the Knoxville (TN) Community Development Company were omitted from this list.
**Includes those Allocation Plans that have requested extensions.

***These PHAs have submitted more than one Allocation Plan.  The figures represented in this table represent the total units designated to date.

Sources of Housing Needs Data for People with Disabilities 

  • State or local Consolidated Plans.  These should include the housing needs of people with disabilities, including supportive housing and the housing needs of homeless people with disabilities for each community covered by the plan.  These can be obtained through the local or State Community Development departments.

  • PHA Plans.  Although some PHA Plans contain little information on the housing needs of people with disabilities, the PHA Plan may include data that can help illustrate the housing crisis locally.  PHA Plans are available to the public through PHA’s offices or some are posted online at www.hud.gov/offices/pih/pha/approved/index.cfm

  • People receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits.  The Social Security Administration has released data on the number of people by state and county who are receiving SSI benefits.  This can be found at www.ssa.gov/statistics/ssi_st_cty/2000/index.html. 

  • Priced Out in 2000: The Crisis Continues.  This TAC/CCD Housing Task Force publication illustrates how people with disabilities who receive SSI are unable to afford rental housing – defined as spending less than 30 percent of one’s income for housing costs – anywhere in the country.  Data is provided for every state and local housing market area in the U.S.  This is posted under TAC’s publications at www.tacinc.org

  • Out of Reach.  The National Low Income Housing Coalition releases an annual report proving the growing disparity between wages earned and housing costs.  Housing affordability statistics are available for every housing market in the country and can be found at www.nlihc.org

  • Sources of Data on State and Local Housing Needs.  The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities recently released a compilation of resources for data collection, including pertinent U.S. Census data, which is constantly updated in its online format at www.cbpp.org/11-30-01hous.htm

  • Local disability data.  Other local disability organizations working to assist people with disabilities with housing issues may have local statistics or studies that include helpful information.

Following through on a Section 8 Application

There may be some PHAs that were required by HUD to apply for Section 8 vouchers as a condition of their Allocation Plan approval but have nonetheless failed to submit an application.  The best way to check to see if PHAs are applying is to contact your local HUD Office (contact information is available at www.hud.gov/local/index.cfm) and ask for the Office of Public and Indian Housing.  Be sure to ask if the PHA has HUD approval to designate public housing units.  Also, ask the HUD staff if there were any conditions imposed by HUD as part of this designation.  This can be determined by reading the HUD letter that approved the designation.  Be sure to ask if the PHA actually followed through with a Section 8 application.  If they did not, then the PHA has not met the conditions of HUD’s approval of the Allocation Plan. 

PHAs with Less than 97 Percent Utilization 

As mentioned above, PHAs with Section 8 utilization rates less than 97 percent are not eligible to apply for new vouchers under this year’s NOFA.  There are approximately 2,600 PHAs currently administering a Section 8 program, and only 994 of those appear on HUD’s list of PHAs eligible to apply for new vouchers this year.  Nationally, this is only 38 percent of the PHAs with Section 8 programs. 

However, this fact should not deter the disability community from finding out if elderly only designation is negatively affecting people with disabilities.  In lieu of obtaining new vouchers, advocates can propose that the PHA set-aside some of its existing unleased vouchers so that they may be issued to people with disabilities who have been adversely affected by designation.  PHAs unwilling to agree to set-aside unleased vouchers for this purpose should be reminded that they will need HUD approval to renew or extend their Allocation Plan and that the disability community will hold the PHA accountable at that time. 

These situations illustrate the need for the disability community to monitor PHA elderly only designation activities.  If some PHAs have not focused on the negative consequences of designation in the past, advocates can get involved now to ensure that all elderly only designation plans for the future are fairly implemented and include the necessary new Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities who need them. 

Other Section 8 Vouchers Available through This Year’s SuperNOFA 

In addition to the 3,950 vouchers linked to PHA Allocation Plans, there are two other Section 8 voucher appropriations that the disability community should be aware of: 

1.      $20 million in funding for 3,950 one-year Section 8 vouchers targeted to non-elderly people with disabilities available though the Rental Assistance for Non-Elderly Persons with Disabilities Related to Certain Developments program (referred to as the “Certain Developments” program).  These Section 8 vouchers are intended to help replace the loss of housing units for people with disabilities that has occurred from the implementation of elderly only housing policies in privately owned HUD- assisted housing.  Only PHAs can apply for these funds and can request up to 200 vouchers.  These applications are due on July 2, 2002. 

2.      $53.9 million in funding for 1,900 five-year Section 8 vouchers exclusively targeted to people with disabilities available through the Mainstream Housing Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities program.  These funds are available to both qualified non-profit disability organizations as well as PHAs administering a Section 8 program.  Qualified applicants can apply for up to 75 vouchers and will be selected through a lottery system.  The application deadline is July 22, 2002. 

Certain Developments Vouchers 

This is the sixth year that Congress has attempted to ensure that new Section 8 Certain Developments vouchers are available in communities that have lost housing for people with disabilities because HUD-subsidized privately owned housing is also being converted to elderly only housing.  TAC and the CCD Housing Task Force have written extensively about this loss of housing – estimated at approximately 275,000 units – which is much greater than the loss of public housing discussed above (see issue 15 of Opening Doors for more on this topic). 

Unfortunately, this year’s NOFA for these funds continues to be difficult for PHAs to respond to because – unlike the public housing designation data that appears in Table 1 – HUD still does not know which HUD-assisted housing owners have actually designated their properties as elderly only.  Despite this lack of information, the Certain Developments NOFA requires PHAs to identify specific properties in the community that have been designated by owners and work with the owners to refer people with disabilities who are still on the waiting lists at these properties to other affordable housing resources. 

As a practical matter, the complicated process outlined by HUD in the NOFA – which a PHA must follow in order to obtain these 3,950 new vouchers for people with disabilities – means that very few PHAs have actually applied for these vouchers.  Because so few PHAs apply, those that do submit qualified applications are almost always funded!  Disability advocates have been able to convince a number of creative and innovative PHAs to work with them to obtain these vouchers.  For example, the State of Connecticut recently obtained 200 of these vouchers, which will enable the Corporation for Supportive Housing and the State to proceed with the development of more than 300 units of permanent supportive housing for homeless people and people with disabilities at risk of homelessness. 

Mainstream Vouchers 

Different from any other Section 8 vouchers described previously, HUD is again permitting both PHAs and qualified non-profit disability organizations to apply for new Mainstream vouchers.  The good news is that this program gives non-profit disability organizations a chance to bring new Section 8 vouchers into their communities – and approximately 25 have received them since these vouchers were first made available to non-profits in 1999.  The bad news is that each year only a few non-profit disability organizations (typically between eight to 12) are actually funded, even though hundreds of organizations submit applications. There are usually more applications from PHAs, and so more PHAs are funded.  However, non-profit disability organizations that can qualify to apply should not overlook these vouchers.  To assist non-profits to evaluate their options, TAC has posted further information on its website ( http://www.tacinc.org ). 

HUD’s Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs 

The SuperNOFA also announced the availability of $950 million in funding for HUD's three McKinney/Vento Homeless Assistance programs.  Funding for these homeless programs is available through the development and submission of a Continuum of Care plan to HUD.  The deadline for the submission of applications for McKinney/Vento Homeless Assistance funding is June 21, 2002

The Continuum of Care is a comprehensive strategic plan to address homelessness developed via a community-wide planning/decision-making process involving government officials; advocates; people who are homeless and formerly homeless; non-profit organizations from the housing and service sectors; and other local stakeholders.  The Continuum of Care process analyzes the services and housing available in a community compared to the needs of people who are homeless.  This process includes the development of strategies and action steps to address identified Continuum needs, including applying to HUD for homeless program funds. 

Permanent Housing Set-Aside 

To increase the amount of permanent housing provided through the McKinney/Vento Homeless Assistance programs, Congress has again mandated that HUD spend at least 30 percent of its McKinney/Vento appropriation on permanent housing.  This is the fourth year in a row that HUD has been subject to this requirement.  This set-aside amounts to approximately $302 million, which can be spent on new or renewal Supportive Housing Program permanent housing projects, new Shelter Plus Care projects, new Section 8 SRO projects, and any new and renewal Safe Haven projects that are administered like a permanent housing program (i.e., tenants have their own leases).  [NOTE:  Congress also set-aside an additional $118 million specifically to renew expiring Shelter Plus Care grants, which are not counted toward the 30 percent set-aside]. 

Again this year, HUD has created a permanent housing bonus in order to encourage more permanent housing applications.  This year the value of the permanent housing bonus – which is added to the community’s “pro-rata need share” – is either $500,000 or the Continuum of Care’s pro-rata need amount, whichever is less.  The bonus will be provided to Continuum of Care systems that rank a new permanent housing project as their number one priority in their HUD application. 

This permanent housing bonus is an incentive for non-profit organizations and governments to ensure that new permanent housing projects are submitted to HUD for funding.  There are also other permanent housing incentives in this year’s NOFA – including offering up to 5 points in the scoring criteria for Continuum of Care applications, which have at least 50 percent of their requested funding (up to the pro-rata need amount) dedicated to housing activities.  For more information, read issue 13 of Opening Doors

Section 811 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities Program 

Approximately $117.5 million in funding is available to develop housing through the Section 811 Supportive Housing Program for Persons with Disabilities.  The Section 811 program was designed to help people with disabilities that have very low incomes live independently in the community by giving non-profit organizations the resources to develop safe and affordable housing.  The application deadline is June 5, 2002. 

Section 811 funding may be used by non-profit organizations to finance the construction, rehabilitation, acquisition, and operating costs of a variety of housing options ranging from small group homes and independent living facilities to units in multi-family housing, condominiums, and cooperative housing developments.  For more information, go to www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm

Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS 

HUD also announced the availability of $27.5 million in funding for projects serving low-income persons with HIV/AIDS through the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Program.  This funding may be used to develop projects that will serve as effective models in addressing the housing and related supportive service needs of low-income persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families. 

Housing-related activities that this funding may be used for include: housing information services; rental assistance; construction, acquisition, rehabilitation, lease, or repair of facilities to provide housing and services; operating costs for housing; and short-term rent, mortgage, and utility payments.  For more information, go to www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.


Back to beginning  | Opening Doors | TAC | CCD Housing Task Force