| Opening Doors A HOUSING PUBLICATION FOR THE DISABILITY COMMUNITY |
|||
MAY 2002 |
|||
9,800 Section
8 Housing
|
A publication of the
|
Featured in this Funding Alert are:
§ Strategies for the disability community to urge PHAs to apply all available Section 8 vouchers, including two other set-asides of Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities;
§ An outline of how non-profit disability organizations can apply directly to administer vouchers through one of these set-asides; and
§
A brief overview of other available HUD funding opportunities.
More information on how to apply for all of these resources can also be found at www.tacinc.org.
Since 1995, the nation’s PHAs have been able to designate
federal public housing buildings as elderly only.
Once this designation occurs, people with disabilities under age 62 are
no longer permitted to move into the properties that have been designated (even
if they have been on the waiting list for years) unless there are no elderly
households on the waiting list.
Because elderly only designation has obvious negative
consequences for people with disabilities, each year since 1997, Congress has
provided new Section 8 vouchers for people with disabilities who are adversely
affected when units in public housing buildings are designated elderly only.
These vouchers have been made available each year to PHAs through the Rental
Assistance for Non-Elderly Persons with Disabilities in Support of Designated
Housing Plans program (referred to as the “Designated Housing” program).
There is no question that people with disabilities have few
housing options left for them when studio and one-bedroom public housing
apartments are exclusively reserved for elderly households.
Consider the plight of John, a man with multiple sclerosis who is 45
years old. Until four years ago,
John earned $25,000 a year as a copy editor.
Unfortunately, his disability progressed so that he can no longer work,
and he now relies on $700 per month in Social Security Disability Income
benefits.
John applied for elderly/disabled public housing in 1999
and is still on the waiting list. In
2001, John’s PHA received approval from HUD to designate the units in this
public housing development as elderly only.
HUD’s approval means that as long as there is an elderly person on this
PHA’s public housing waiting list – even if they applied yesterday – the
elderly person will be offered the next vacant unit that becomes available.
The only way that John will be able to move into this property is if
there are literally no elderly households left on the waiting list.
Because the housing John applied for is very desirable, well located, and
well maintained, elderly households apply to live there on a regular basis.
John stands virtually no chance of getting a unit in this property until
he turns 62.
As part of the designation process, the PHA could have
requested new Section 8 vouchers from HUD to help people with disabilities like
John who were on PHA’s public waiting list or who might have applied at some
future time if the housing had not been designated. Unfortunately, this PHA decided not to request these
vouchers. HUD also did not obligate
the PHA to apply for new Section 8 vouchers for people like John as a condition
of approving the PHA’s Allocation Plan (the plan required by HUD in order to
designated any public housing units). In
its Allocation Plan, the PHA told HUD that they would make other resources
available for people like John. However,
John is still struggling to find an affordable apartment and doesn’t have a
Section 8 voucher to help him pay the rent.
Unfortunately, there are many people like John who have
been deprived of federally subsidized housing opportunities because of elderly
only housing policies. Housing
advocates for people with disabilities are still trying to decipher why PHAs
that have designated public housing units as elderly only do not apply for these
new vouchers and what can be done about it.
Public Law 104-120, which governs elderly only designation,
states that PHAs seeking to designate elderly only housing must give HUD a
description of “any plans to secure additional resources or housing assistance
to provide assistance to families that may
have been housed if occupancy in the project were not restricted” [emphasis
added]. HUD guidance issued on
March 12, 1997 further states that this law focuses on the total housing
needs of the low-income population of a community and not one group – such as
elderly households – in particular. The
HUD Notice further states:
In most communities, there are
substantial unmet housing needs of both elderly families and persons with
disabilities. For these
communities, a public housing authority’s demonstration that it will make reasonable efforts to provide tenant based assistance or other
appropriate resources to the non-designated group is sufficient for designation.
[Emphasis added]
The most obvious interpretation of the above federal policy
is that:
Þ
If there is an unmet
need for housing for people with disabilities in a community;
Þ
And
if a PHA intends to designate elderly/disabled public housing as elderly only;
Þ
And
if Congress has made available new Section 8 vouchers for people with
disabilities specifically for these PHAs designating elderly only housing;
Þ
Then
it is reasonable to expect that PHAs would be obligated to apply for them.
Through this Opening Doors Funding Alert, the
Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. (TAC) and the Consortium for Citizens
with Disabilities Housing Task Force (CCD Housing Task Force) are urging housing
advocates for people with disabilities to contact PHAs that have been
designating elderly only housing and remind them of their obligation to apply
for these vouchers during this year’s Section 8 application process.
To be as effective as possible in these discussions, advocates will need
information about:
Ø Available Section 8 vouchers and how PHAs can apply for them; and
Ø
Which PHAs have designated elderly only housing and whether they
have or have not applied for Section 8 vouchers in conjunction with this
designation.
This year, Congress has appropriate $20 million in new
funding to provide 3,950 new Designated Housing Section 8 vouchers for people
with disabilities who can no longer move into elderly only public housing units.
A PHA is eligible to apply for up to 200 of these vouchers.
Applications for these vouchers are due to HUD by July 23, 2002.
Despite the number of public housing units that have
disappeared for people with disabilities over the years, PHAs have been slow to
apply for vouchers to replace these lost units. In fact, for the past several years, HUD has not received
enough applications from PHAs designating elderly only housing to give out all
the available vouchers. For
example, during a recent 12-month period, HUD approved 50 PHA Allocation Plans
but only 5 of these PHAs applied for the new vouchers that Congress linked to
public housing designation.
From these data, it is reasonable to conclude that many
people with disabilities who were on PHA public housing waiting lists – like
John mentioned above – have been left with no affordable housing options at
all. Advocates for people with
disabilities have been concerned by this lack of response from PHAs, and are
intent on making sure that PHAs do not shirk their responsibilities to people
with disabilities in their eagerness to create elderly only buildings.
In order to be eligible to apply for the new “Designated
Housing” vouchers, PHAs must have a HUD-approved Allocation Plan.
As stated above, HUD has been approving Allocation Plans since 1995, and
has approved a total of 196 plans to date.
These plans, in the aggregate, have designated approximately 63,000 units
of public housing as elderly only. Many
of these are units with accessibility modifications to accommodate the needs of
people with disabilities. More and
more units are being designated each month and HUD is now granting extensions to
plans that were originally approved in the mid-1990s.
PHAs with a HUD-approved Allocation Plan are eligible to
apply for this set-aside of Section 8 vouchers, even if the Allocation Plan was
approved three or four years ago. In
order to assist the disability community to identify these PHAs, TAC has
included a list of all PHAs with Allocation Plans approved since 1997 in Table
1. This table, which is
compiled from data made available by HUD, is organized alphabetically by state.
To view HUD’s most up-to-date listing, go to www.hud.gov/offices/pih/centers/sac/designated.
A review of HUD’s data from Table 1
shows that some PHAs have neglected to apply for these new Section 8 vouchers
targeted to people with disabilities affected by designation, even though PHAs
have reduced the number of public housing units available to people with
disabilities. The table on page 6
indicates exactly how many public housing units were designated elderly only and
how many vouchers the PHA received from HUD that year.
It is important to note that PHAs that have designated elderly only
housing can apply year after year for new vouchers for people with disabilities
as long as: (1) Congress makes new vouchers available; and (2) the PHA can show
a need for the vouchers. To
illustrate how Table 1 should be interpreted, some examples of the data included
in this table are provided below:
Ø
The Municipal Housing Authority in Des Moines, Iowa designated 190
units of public housing as elderly only in 2001 but did not receive any
designated vouchers from HUD.
Ø
The Housing Authority of Durham, North Carolina also designated
elderly only housing in 2001 – 389 units in total – and requested 200
vouchers for people with disabilities to offset this loss of housing.
Ø
In 1999, the Housing Authority of West Warwick, Rhode Island
designated 250 units of public housing as elderly only but did not receive any
vouchers for people with disabilities in 1999, 2000, or 2001, even though
vouchers were available.
Ø
The City of Las Vegas Housing Authority also designated 570 units
as elderly only housing in 1999. However,
this PHA has received 200 new vouchers for people with disabilities each year
since 1999.
It is difficult to know for certain what happens to people
with disabilities on public housing waiting lists once designation occurs.
For example, it is reasonable to conclude that people with disabilities
in Las Vegas, Nevada who were adversely affected by designation were given other
housing options because the PHA applied for a total of 600 new Section 8
vouchers over a three-year period. However,
it is very difficult to learn what happened to people with disabilities in
communities that never received new vouchers to mitigate the impact of
designation.
To learn more, the disability community may want to ask
these questions to PHAs that did not receive new vouchers linked to designation:
If the answer to the last question is yes, then these
follow-up questions are also important:
It is clear that the disability community must take the
lead in holding PHAs accountable for designation, and must do more to ensure
that PHAs apply for every voucher that Congress makes available for elderly only
designation purposes. Showing a
legitimate demand for these vouchers is the best way to show federal policy
makers that these set-aside vouchers are needed – and will continue to be
needed – as long as PHAs continue to designate housing as elderly only.
To obtain new vouchers, the disability community must
immediately organize to do several things:
Unfortunately, the 97
percent utilization rate requirement is a real barrier for disability advocates
seeking to convince a PHA to apply for new vouchers. It is also a problem for people with disabilities who need
subsidized housing because there is no guarantee or obligation that a PHA
designating elderly only housing will set-aside any of its existing unused
vouchers for people with disabilities.
Remember that a PHA with housing designated
elderly only as far back as 1995 is eligible to apply to obtain new vouchers
from this set-aside, even if they have applied in the past. For HUD’s complete and most up-to-date listing of all
Allocation Plans, go to www.hud.gov/offices/pih/centers/sac/designated.
In fact, last year, 8 of the 13 applications received by HUD for these
vouchers were from PHAs that had designated housing in prior years.
Below is a list of PHAs with HUD-approved elderly only Allocation Plans from 1997 through March 8, 2002.* This chart is adapted from HUD’s online version, posted at www.hud.gov/offices/pih/centers/sac/designated. Please refer to this site for information on Allocation Plans approved before 1997. The PHAs are organized by state including the number of units designated elderly only as well as the number of Section 8 vouchers awarded to the PHA in conjunction with the Allocation Plan (if any).
|
State |
Housing Agency (PHA) |
# Units Designated |
# Vouchers Awarded (Year) |
|||||
|
PHAs with Plans Currently Pending Approval |
||||||||
|
KS |
Topeka PHA |
unknown |
N/A |
|||||
|
LA |
PHA of New Orleans |
unknown |
N/A |
|||||
|
NE |
Omaha PHA |
unknown |
N/A |
|||||
|
OH |
Dayton Metropolitan PHA |
unknown |
N/A |
|||||
|
OH |
Zanesville Metropolitan PHA |
unknown |
N/A |
|||||
|
TN |
Tennessee Housing Development Agency |
unknown |
N/A |
|||||
|
PHAs with Approved Allocation Plans** |
||||||||
|
AL |
Mobile Housing Board |
122 |
122 (‘00) |
|||||
|
AZ |
City of Phoenix |
264 |
200
(‘98) |
|||||
|
CA |
City of Santa Barbara PHA |
142 |
100
(‘97) |
|||||
|
CA |
Imperial Valley PHA |
34 |
49
(‘97) |
|||||
|
CA |
Kern County PHA |
150 |
150 (‘98) |
|||||
|
CA |
Oakland PHA |
383 |
85 (‘01) |
|||||
|
CO |
Boulder City PHA |
95 |
none |
|||||
|
CT |
Danbury PHA |
152 |
152 (‘99) |
|||||
|
CT |
Greenwich PHA |
150 |
78 (‘00) |
|||||
|
CT |
PHA of City of New Haven |
95 |
none |
|||||
|
CT |
Manchester PHA |
100 |
36 (‘00) |
|||||
|
CT |
Naugatuck PHA |
104 |
20 (‘00) |
|||||
|
CT |
Norwalk PHA |
249 |
50 (‘98) |
|||||
|
CT |
Stratford PHA |
171 |
none |
|||||
|
CT |
Torrington PHA |
198 |
none |
|||||
|
CT |
Vernon PHA |
136 |
none |
|||||
|
CT |
Winchester PHA |
79 |
20 (‘01) |
|||||
|
CT |
Windsor Locks PHA |
60 |
32 (‘00) |
|||||
|
DC |
DC PHA*** |
392 |
47 (‘99); 200 (‘00) |
|||||
|
FL |
PHA of Brevard County |
159 |
200 (‘00) |
|||||
|
FL |
PHA of Hollywood |
90 |
none |
|||||
|
FL |
PHA of the City of Daytona Beach |
142 |
30
(‘98) |
|||||
|
FL |
PHA of the City of Key West |
199 |
none |
|||||
|
FL |
PHA of the City of Lakeland |
33 |
none |
|||||
|
FL |
PHA of the City of Miami Beach |
200 |
none |
|||||
|
FL |
Hialeah PHA |
640 |
148 (‘01) |
|||||
|
FL |
Jacksonville PHA |
617 |
75 (‘98) |
|||||
|
FL |
Melbourne PHA |
100 |
none |
|||||
|
FL |
Miami-Dade PHA |
381 |
200 (‘99) |
|||||
|
FL |
Orlando PHA |
48 |
none |
|||||
|
FL |
Palm Beach County PHA |
100 |
none |
|||||
|
FL |
Tampa PHA |
600 |
150 (‘99) |
|||||
|
GA |
PHA of Fulton County |
223 |
none |
|||||
|
IA |
Des Moines Municipal PHA |
190 |
none |
|||||
|
IA |
Keokuk PHA |
50 |
none |
|||||
|
IA |
Waterloo PHA |
50 |
none |
|||||
|
IL |
PHA of Elgin |
150 |
none |
|||||
|
IL |
PHA of the City of Waukegan |
98 | ||||||