Social Securitys Readiness for the Impending Wave of Baby Boomer Beneficiaries
(Hearing in the Social Security Subcommittee, March 16, 2000)
by the
Consortium for Citizens with
Disabilities
Social Security Task Force
March 30, 2000
The Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Social Security Task
Force appreciates the opportunity to comment on the readiness of the Social Security
Administration to meet the needs of the impending wave of baby boomer beneficiaries.
As the Subcommittee Hearing Advisory acknowledges, SSA workloads are
projected to begin increasing rapidly within the next decade as the baby boom generation
begins to reach its peak disability years just prior to reaching early retirement age
beginning in 2008. In addition, the SSA
workforce is also aging and will begin to lose significant numbers of staff, including
senior and leadership staff. About 3,000
employees are expected to retire per year from 2007 through 2009. Finally, SSA is also taking on new or more complex
responsibilities such as providing increased rehabilitation and employment services for
people with disabilities, completing and maintaining an appropriate schedule of continuing
disability reviews (CDRs) and other eligibility reviews, and new approaches to prevent
fraud and abuse.
In FY 1985, SSAs staffing levels were measured at 80,844 FTEs
and 83,406 workyears. The estimates for FY
2000 include 63,350 FTEs and 65,203 workyears, for a reduction of 17,494 FTEs and 18,203
workyears over the last 15 years.
The CCD Social Security Task Force has voiced concern for some time
over the continued long-term downsizing of the SSA workforce. We believe that failure to conduct appropriate and
timely CDRs and other eligibility reviews could lead to decreased trust in the integrity
of the Social Security and SSI programs. In
addition, the new efforts to assist people with disabilities to go to work, through the
Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999, will require new and expanded
approaches for SSA interaction with beneficiaries.
Adequate staffing levels are critical for these and other efforts to
be successful, especially given the coming disability and retirement years of baby
boomers.
For these reasons, the CCD Social Security Task Force strongly
supports the proposal that the Social Security Administrations Limitation on
Administrative Expenses (LAE) budget authority should be removed from the domestic
discretionary spending category. While SSAs LAE
account is categorized as discretionary spending, the Social Security program is
considered off-budget and the OASDI portion of the LAE is also considered off-budget when
calculating the overall budget surplus or deficit. Both
the OASDI and SSI programs that SSA administers are considered as mandatory spending. Yet under current law, the entire LAE is
considered under the domestic discretionary budget cap.
The independent, bipartisan Social Security Advisory Board has unanimously
urged that SSAs administrative budget, like its program budget, be explicitly
excluded from the statutory cap that imposes an arbitrary limit on the amount of
discretionary government spending. (Testimony of the Honorable Stanford Ross, Chair,
Social Security Advisory Board, February 10, 2000)
The CCD Task Force believes that the entire LAE should be removed
from under the domestic discretionary spending caps so that SSAs administrative
functions can continue to operate smoothly for beneficiaries. For instance, SSA should have no artificial
constraints in continuing to be able to take a single individuals applications for
Social Security, Medicare, and SSI.
It is important to note that even if the LAE were removed from the
domestic discretionary caps, SSAs LAE would still be subject to the annual
appropriations process and Congressional oversight. Currently,
SSAs administrative expenses total less than 2% of benefit payments paid annually. Congress would still maintain its role in
ensuring continued administrative efficiency.
Most importantly, removal of the LAE from the domestic discretionary
spending caps would remove it from competition with other programs for limited funds. It would allow for growth that is necessary to
meet the needs of the coming baby-boomer retirement years (including the retirement of SSA
and state DDS personnel); continue the efforts to improve the processing time for initial
applications and appeals; and continue the efforts to ensure integrity in the program
through CDRs and other redeterminations. The
Presidents budget request for FY 2001 includes a healthy 5 percent increase in the
LAE. Yet due to increasing workloads, even
with such increases, performance rates are expected to decline in the following areas: the
5-minute access rate to the 800 number; number of initial disability decisions pending;
the number of hearings processed; and the number of CDRs processed.
Annually, the Appropriations Committees need to have the ability to approve adequate funds for the administration of the Social Security programs without weakening other human services programs. Without removal of LAE from the discretionary caps, any increases in SSA staffing and DDS funding will have to be offset by reductions in other health, education, and human needs programs. It is critical that SSA be allowed to make necessary investments in building the staffing infrastructure necessary to meet the needs of the population, as well as new statutory responsibilities such as the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act.
ON BEHALF OF:
Adapted Physical Activity Council
American Association on Mental Retardation
American Network of Community Options and Resources
Association for Persons in Supported Employment
Brain Injury Association
Inter-National Association of Business, Industry and Rehabilitation
International Association of Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services
National Association of Developmental Disabilities Councils
National Mental Health Association
National Organization of Social Security Claimants Representatives
NISH
Paralyzed Veterans of America
Research Institute for Independent Living
The Arc of the United States
Title II Community AIDS National Network
United Cerebral Palsy Associations, Inc.
1730 K Street, NW, Suite 1212 Washington, DC 20006 202/785-3388 FAX 467-4179 info@c-c-d.org www.c-c-d.org