CCD Logo

 

Financial Loan Programs for People with Disabilities 

Background 

Under Title III of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, P.L. No. 105-394 (AT Act), Congress established the Alternative Financing Program to provide a new funding source for assistive technology.  Through the program, the federal government provides grants to states to create financial loan programs, such as low cost loans, which allow individuals with disabilities to purchase assistive technology.

 

What is Assistive Technology?

 

Assistive technology can be as simple as a wheelchair ramp that provides access to a home, or it can be as elaborate as a computerized leg prosthesis that precisely produces the complex motion of a human leg. The many types of assistive technology (AT) now available in the United States offer individuals with disabilities independence and support in employment, education, health care, information technology and community living.  Because individuals with disabilities typically have high expenses connected with their disability, and high medical expenses, and often have low income levels, it is difficult for many to afford the AT that they need.

 

Loan Program Grants

 

Under Title III, Congress appropriated funds for three grant competitions to provide seed monies for these loan programs.  States interested in the grants were required to match federal dollars to create the loan programs.  The ration for match funds differed by grant year.  See Tables 1 and 2.

 

Table 1.  Loan Program Grant Competitions

Grant Year

Federal Appropriation

Number of Grants

Federal Grant

State Match

Total Program

FY 2000

$3,800,000

6

$3,792,576

$3,792,576

$7,585,152

FY 2001

$15,000,000

14

$13,633,286

$4,638,876

$18,270,162

FY 2003

AFP

$36,000,000

26

$35,859,229

$11,454,767

$47,319,380

 

 

Loan Program Activity

 

Data on loan activity is currently available for the first two years of operation.  The first year of operation ran from October 2000 to September 2001, the second year of operation ran from October 2001 to September 2002.  See tables 3 and 4 for details about applications, borrowers and equipment purchased. 

 

 

Table 2.  Loan Activity

Year

Number of States Providing Loans

Number of Applications Received

Number of Loans Closed*

Dollar Value of Loans Closed

2000-2001

5

351

229 (65%)

$2,309,356

2001-2002

13

942

537 (57%)

$5,849,354

*Number of loans closed = loans approved by bank/AFP and accepted by borrower.

 

 

Table 3.  Loan Highlights from 2002-2003

Most Popular AT Purchased

Adapted Transportation

Mobility Equipment

Building Modifications

Computer Equipment

Interest Rates/ Terms

0% to 9.9%

for 1 - 20 years

Loan Amounts

$4,871 Median

$10,855 Mean

Median Monthly Incomes

$2,150 for borrowers

$1,260 for those who did not receive loans

Approval Rate for Loans*

57%

*Loans approved by bank/AFP and accepted by borrower.

 

 

Program Structure

 

Title III requires state programs to meet certain conditions to qualify for AFP funding. A state must enter into a contract to administer the AFP with a community-based organization that involves individuals with disabilities in decision-making at all organizational levels. The community-based organization then is required to enter into a contract with a lending institution or state financing agency. Each state must provide consumers with one or a combination of the following financing mechanisms: a low-interest loan fund; an interest buy-down program; a revolving loan fund; a loan guarantee or insurance program; a program operated by a partnership among private entities for the purchase, lease, or other acquisition of AT devices or AT services; or another mechanism that meets program requirements.  Many of the Title I programs administer and/or operate Title III loan programs.  There are currently three states that are operating financial loan programs for AT that are funded by sources other than AT Act funds.  These programs include Maine which has a $5 million program funded through a bond referendum; California and West Virginia loan programs are funded solely with state dollars.  It is not clear whether or not the California loan program, which had been operated by the Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, is still active.

 

Table 4.   States Operating Some Type of Alternative Financing Program

State

Title III – 2000

Title III – 2001

Title III – 2003

Title I Funds

Other

Alabama

No

No

No

Yes

 

Alaska

No

No

No

No

No

American Samoa

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona

 

$200,000

 

 

 

Arkansas

 

$1.6 million

 

 

 

California

 

 

 

 

Yes

Colorado

No

No

No

No

No

Connecticut

 

 

 

Yes

 

Delaware

No

No

$1.2 million

No

No

DC

No

No

No

Yes

No

Florida

 

$840,000

$1.694 million

 

 

Georgia

 

 

$2.084 million

 

 

Guam

 

 

$508,392

 

 

Hawaii

No

No

No

Yes

No

Idaho

No

No

No

Yes

No

Illinois

 

$3 million

$4.304 million

 

 

Indiana

No

No

No

Yes

No

Iowa

 

 

$643,964

 

 

Kansas

$1.485 million

 

$9.791 million

 

 

Kentucky

 

$1.4 million

$189,800

 

 

Louisiana

 

$2 million

 

 

 

Maine

No

No

No

No

Yes- Bond Ref

Maryland

$1 million

$1.473 million

$1.694 million

 

 

Massachusetts

 

 

$2.259 million

 

 

Michigan

 

$575,600

$847,321

 

 

Minnesota

 

 

$1.694 million

 

 

Mississippi

No

No

No

No

No

Missouri

$1.1 million

 

 

 

 

Montana

No

No

No

Yes

No

Nebraska

 

 

$847,320

 

 

Nevada

 

$1.296 million

 

 

 

New Hampshire

No

No

No

Yes

No

New Jersey

No

No

No

No

No

New Mexico

 

 

$1.694 million

 

 

New York

 

 

 

 

 

North Carolina

No

No

No

No

No

North Dakota

 

 

$1.695 million

 

 

Northern Mariana Islands

 

 

$508,392

 

 

Ohio

No

No

No

Yes

State Treasurer

Oklahoma

 

$300,000

$796,481

 

 

Oregon

No

No

No

No

No

Pennsylvania

$1 million

$600,000

$1.770 million

 

 

Puerto Rico

No

No

No

No

No

Rhode Island

No

No

No

No

No

South Carolina

 

 

$542,285

 

 

South Dakota

No

No

No

Yes

No

Tennessee

No

No

No

No

No

Texas

No

No

No

No

No

U. S. Virgin Islands

 

 

$647,320

 

 

Utah

$1 million

$700,000

$338,928

 

 

Vermont

 

 

$847,653

 

 

Virginia

$2 million

$3.285 million

$6.588 million

 

 

Washington

 

 

$847,321

 

 

West Virginia

No

No

No

No

State Funds

Wisconsin

 

$1 million

$3.050 million

 

 

Wyoming

 

 

$223,693

 

 

 

Dollar amounts represent total program (Federal award and state match).

 

 

 

 

Table 5. Comparison of Title I and Title III State Lead Agencies

States with Same Lead Agency as Title